Jump to content

User talk:Will74205

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hi, Will74205, Welcome to Wikipedia!


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Fix spelling and grammar
None
Fix original research issues

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.


I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Wikipedia:Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and The FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page.

Additional Tips:

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

  • If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
  • If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like &#126&#126~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Happy Wiki-ing. -- John Fader 18:43, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

California WikiProject

[edit]

Since you are in San Jose, California, I'd like to mention the fairly new California WikiProject. Please take a look at the page and see if there is anything that interests you. Also let me know if you have any questions or comments. BlankVerse ∅ 15:00, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

USS Kidd (DDG-993)

[edit]

I sent an email to the Navy General Headquarters and here is the reply. http://www.flickr.com/photos/51744539@N00/82378438/ They confirmed that USS 995 Scott => ROCS 1801 Kee Lung; USS 993 Kidd => ROCS 1803 Tso Ying. Hydonsingore 05:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Surfliner discussion

[edit]

Hey, there, you replied to my comment on the Talk:Capitol Corridor page regarding its place as the third-busiest line.

I noticed on your user page that you were a contributor to the Caltrain pages, so I figured you may be into trains as well. I am currently trying to get a job with Amtrak as an assistant conductor, hopefuly in California.

Anyway, wanted to do a virtual handshake and say, "Hello!" Hope my edit on the Pacific Surfliner page, comments on the talk pages and the edit summaries were okay. I am pretty new to editing, so it's exciting.

Anyway, take care!

Re: Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport

[edit]

What is needed to be said has been said. Taiwan Province and Taiwan do not mean the same thing. So as Republic of China and Taiwan. Meanwhile, please revert your own vandalism to the article. You're introducing errors to the article in your reverts. Thanks. Have a nice holiday. — Instantnood 16:31, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Taiwan

[edit]

I replaced the map of Taiwan (image) that you deleted from Republic of China. I am NOT arguing with you regarding ROC's claims to all of China - that is a fact. But, in turn, I ask that you acknowledge the FACT that ROC is currently PHYSICALLY located on Taiwan, and the FACT that such a map IS useful to readers.

I have moved the map to a different section, and removed all wording in the caption of the map that might be misunderstood. If you feel that the caption of the map is wrong, please CHANGE THE CAPTION. The caption CAN be edited. Please do NOT remove the entire map if you disagree with the caption. Thanks. John Broughton | Talk 00:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you've convinced me - see Talk:Republic of China. And I apologize for the capitalization - I copied that from another talk page, where I thought a bit more emphasis was needed, without really thinking about it. John Broughton | Talk 02:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diesel Multiple Unit

[edit]

Please undo your move. The correct term is Diesel Multiple Unit. Several of them may be called Deisel Multiple Units, but that would be like changing the article Hot dog to [[Hot Dogs]], just because you usually eat two. Please see The Railway Transportation Website for reference.Jerry lavoie 04:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you consider the possibility that the website might be wrong all along? To me Multiple Unit"s" should be plural is like "pants", there is no "pant". --Will74205 04:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I considered the possibility that the railway Technology Industry website was wrong about the correct name for this railway technology. But when I compare it to your grammatical hunch, it seemed more likely that you were wrong. Check out the websites of some of the manufacturers of this technology... eg. Siemens... they call it Diesel Multiple Unit, as well. Here is a list to make it easier for you:
In fact the only websites I found that use the plural form are either talking about two different DMU models. (except one blog site.) Jerry lavoie 04:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I looked at the http://www.mda.org.uk/railway/raindexd.htm and I see that the "unit" refers to a train unit, not many "units(cars)" make up the train. I'll change my works. --Will74205 04:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank-you. Jerry lavoie 04:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

California high-speed rail

[edit]

I've bolded the stations on LA-SF part of the California high-speed rail route map, though I'm considering putter the rest of the route in blue instead. Tompw (talk) 11:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accord reply

[edit]

WikiProject Autos policy goes against putting the newest version of a car as head image regardless of quality. Having a lower-quality photo of a car that's already depicted elsewhere in the article is simply less useful than a better photo of a variant not already shown (facelifted 2006-2007 model). IFCAR 12:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

[edit]

Please see the response to your query here. Thanks. Pastordavid (talk) 21:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Referendum

[edit]

Fixed Gnevin (talk) 23:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

THSR

[edit]

This is to notify you that I responded to you editing out the "core technology" part from the article a second time, this time with reference to my bad grammar, on that article's Talk page. I hope you or someone else can find a proper formulation without omitting "core technology/system" (and I submit my English isn't perfect). --Rontombontom (talk) 13:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BurlingameCitySeal.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:BurlingameCitySeal.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:19, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:KHH.PNG

[edit]
Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:KHH.PNG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:23, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:VTA Downtown Campbell Station.PNG

[edit]

File:VTA Downtown Campbell Station.PNG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:VTA Downtown Campbell Station.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:VTA Downtown Campbell Station.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Littoral combat ship

[edit]

Please do not reinsert the prose line style back into the article, that was why the tag was on it in the 1st place, it is not appropriate according the the Wikipedia Manual of Style. The thought behind it being that prose line eventually becomes unreadable and there isn't a thought to follow any more. This did indeed happen to the article. The proseline style is appropriate for recent event sort of articles but this article has been on the project far too long to continue with this style. If you want more of the subject matter in that section then please expand into coherent paragraphs related to that section. Ever changing figures just got to the point that the budget for the project has been every upwards and and expanding.Tirronan (talk) 18:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then I suggest you start writing if not I will revert in 7 days and you will be in front of the admins for edit warring that clear enough for you?Tirronan (talk) 01:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:United States Navy canceled ships

[edit]

Category:United States Navy canceled ships, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 02:17, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caltrain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bombardier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Taipei‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Taiwan is the name we use in infoboxes and leads. Just Taiwan not Republic of China. The link to the Taiwan article will explain other English and official names. This has been discussed many times before. If you want to change these articles you will have to change consensus first, not do mass changes with no discussion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:07, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capitol Corridor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capitol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:PLOT

[edit]

Hello, Will74205. I reverted you here because that is too much plot. Also, we use present tense for plot sections. See MOS:PLOT for what I mean. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 10:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again. Regarding this, I'm replying here at your talk page to keep the discussion centralized; I dislike disjointed discussion. The section at that article was already too long to begin with. It was at 1114 words, according to wordcounter.net; that is, if we don't count the hidden note. MOS:PLOT points to WP:Film plot, which recommends that plot summaries for feature films be between 400 and 700 words. You added a character count of 1,292; check the edit history for that number. So what you added was indeed plot bloat. You did better with this 335 character count, but it's still extra detail on an overly long plot summary. Regarding how long the section is at this very moment, counttools.com says that the plot section is 1192 words...while wordcounter.net says that the plot summary is 1190 words. Similar results are no doubt given at other word counters. So, at some point, a WP:Film editor will either tag that section with Template:Plot or significantly cut the section; if the editor is a good cutter, he or she will cut without removing vital details. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note: You need to be careful marking edits as minor when they are not; see WP:Minor. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The 335 character count addition was not a minor edit, for example. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping to trim the plot, like you did here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Will74205. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capitol Corridor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capitol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electrification of Caltrain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FRA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Cinderella (2015 Disney film)#Names per credits

[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cinderella (2015 Disney film)#Names per credits. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:14, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited San Joaquin (train), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Jose. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Will74205. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Will74205. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Caltrain Stops

[edit]

Template:Caltrain Stops has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:12, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of railway electrification systems, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taoyuan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Chinese Professional Baseball League season moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, 2021 Chinese Professional Baseball League season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Chinese Professional Baseball League season 2 (March 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, 2021 Chinese Professional Baseball League season, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please put your edits in the other draft article and provide more evidence that it is underway.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Will74205! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Chinese Professional Baseball League season has been accepted

[edit]
2021 Chinese Professional Baseball League season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Will74205&oldid=1258261631"